Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nemo Omnis's avatar

The thesis is correct, paywalls are undemocratic, in the sense that one person, not the majority, is making the decision. Because labor isn't democratic. No group of people get to decide how we monitize our content, how we spend our time, how we live our lives.

But, 'undemocratic' is often used as 'unfair', which paywals absolutely are not. There is no grey area here. Unfair is taking someone's work, because you feel entitled to it.

"None of those questions has a universal right or wrong answer."

This might work for some things, but being entitled to someone else's labor, time, and creative output has a word. It is 'ownership', it is slavery. If anyone tries to claim they have ownership over your work, they are not worth engaging with.

On a lighter note, I do the "content free, but paid subs on" model, with a twist. Any 'followup' I manually paywall after two weeks. Free subs still get everything, but to go through the longer form stories later, you need to pay for the archive access. It also keeps 'part 1' stories as free previews.

Stanley B. Trice's avatar

I have not set up a paying function (to be paid or paying someone) because I am still exploring this platform. I do support on Patreon. But more people are moving from that place ( at least it seems to me) to Substack.

30 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?